I remember when I first heard about Microsoft’s pioneering tool for lifelogging, the Sensecam, a small camera you wear around, that automatically takes a picture of everything you see, as soon as a person enters your personal space or you change environment. Typically, the output of this little machine “logs” your day, creates as it were a slideshow of your life. And I remember finding this a little creepy, this whole concept of lifelogging, an intrusion of my private life, even if, of course, an intrusion I’ve chosen myself.

Then there was Twitter. Which is, if you want, also a form of lifelogging, although it’s more life-sharing: you decide to share a thought, an idea, a moment, an experience with a group of people that find your life interesting enough to follow. I’ve tried it, but found out I really couldn’t be bothered with other people’s lives (which is why most reality programs bypass me completely - I guess I’m just not interested in other people :).
However, I find myself using the Facebook-application on my iPhone more and more. I take pictures, use captions, upload them and share them with the world. Or at least the people I know well enough to allow them to be Facebook-friends. Which is still a loose definition, by any standard.
So these people can now see where I am, what I read, what I’m doing, who I’m seeing, how I feel. Many people now know how I spent my weekend. And I feel allright about that, and I wonder why. Why is it that I, and of course I mean also the other thousands of people who do this, seem to have and enjoy ts urge to share my life with others?
Is it narcissism? Exhibitionism? Is it anxiety (do I even have a life?)? Is it coincidental that I’m only using negative motivations here, and not, say, things like “openness to the world”, “friendship” and stuff like that? Do I think something is inherently wrong about this, well, let’s call it, screaming for attention? Could it be just, say, interaction?
Now, I have never shunned the personal in this blog, even if it is officially a company blog. And on Facebook, I’m nog getting too personal either (I never forget clients and prospects might be reading too :). So the difference between the two worlds is not that big. And yet, I have to admit, and you will be with me here, that I haven’t done much blogging lately. I could, of course, blame work and deadlines for this, but these deadlines have not stopped me from using Facebok a lot more. So there’s more to it.
Dear old Henk (”old” is used here in the metaphorical sense, obviously) told me he basically stopped blogging because “blogs are dead”. Possibly it’s about the feeling that with a blog, you lecture; with social media, you communicate. With a blog, you have to make a point somewhere, you have to have something to say. With social media, a picture or a mere “hello” will do. With a blog, you’re on your own, you throw something in the world, and others may pick it up, or not, but you basically have no idea. In social media, there is the illusion people are always around.

Is that it? In this hyper-connected world, we are all becoming contact-junkies?
Or is this just a practical application of Guillaume’s central thesis, that we should all, as individual people, become brands, and hero brands while we’re at it?